Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 218 Miss. 547 - Windham v. Windham

Windham v. Windham’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
July 1994
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 1994 · most notably 639 So. 2d 921 - Ferguson v. Ferguson (1994), Brabham v. Brabham (1955)

4 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

8019531960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McCraney v. McCraney · Chrismond v. Chrismond · Bush v. Bush · Griffin v. Griffin · Todd v. Todd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`A resulting trust arises, if at all, in the same transaction in which the legal title passes, at the time that legal title passes, on consideration advanced before or at that time, and not from matters thereafter occurring or on consideration thereafter advanced unless occurring or advanced immediately thereafter so as to be in fact a part of the transaction. The fundamental reason for the rule is that the resulting trust is one implied by law from the circumstances of consideration at the time of the transaction' * * *.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The attempt of the decree in this case, in and of itself, to divest out of the husband and wife and invest in the other a one-half interest and title to their respective real properties was ineffectual as a transmission of title.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]e know of no authority for a court to divest the husband of the title to his property and to vest the title in the wife by judicial fiat or decree.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.