Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 218 MO 624 - Pullis v. Somerville

Pullis v. Somerville’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 1959
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 1959

16 state decisions

70190919101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grubbs v. Cones · Bobb v. Bobb · Cruce v. Cruce · State ex rel. Spaulding v. Peterson · Vogt v. Butler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But when taken before the clerk and left with him it is filed; the endorsement ‘filed’ by the clerk, is only evidence of the fact. In Grubbs v. Cones, 57 Mo. 83 , the court said: ‘The filing is the actual delivery of the paper to the clerk, without regard to any action that he may take thereon.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.