Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

218 N.C. 384

11 S.E.2d 142

In Re Cook

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1940

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1940-10-30

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1940-10-30

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 1985

10 state decisions

4019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Stacy, C. J.

¶1 The record discloses a proceeding in accordance with the provisions of Art. 3, ch. 103, of the Consolidated Statutes, which, in strictness, seems to be neither a civil action nor a special proceeding, notwithstanding C. S., 391. McIntosh on Procedure, 96.

¶2 It is not contemplated that there should be a jury trial of the issue in a matter of this kind. A justice of the peace may take the evidence and act in ease of emergency, when for any reason the clerk is not immediately available. C. S., 6195. No guardian is sought to be appointed to manage the property of the respondent, and hence the provisions of C. S., 2285, are not presently applicable.

¶3*386 Moreover, there is no provision for an appeal from the order of the clerk to the Superior Court in a proceeding under this article. 'Whether certiorari would be available is not presented. In re Sylivant, 212 N. C., 343, 193 S. E., 422. The respondent may not call to his aid the provisions of C. S., 2302. There was evidence to support the order of the clerk.

¶4 Affirmed.

/218/nc/384 · .json · Public domain