Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 218 NCAPP 233 - State v. Pender

State v. Pender’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Wainwright v. Witt · Hernandez v. New York · Powers v. Ohio · Purkett v. Elem

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If at any time during the course of the proceedings the court determines that a party has failed to comply with [ N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-905(c)(1) ] or with an order issued pursuant to this Article, the court in addition to exercising its contempt powers may prohibit the party from introducing evidence not disclosed. Which of the several remedies available under G.S. 15A-910(a) should be applied in a particular case is a matter within the trial court's sound discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “This Court reviews assignments of error regarding jury instructions de novo .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.