Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 218 Neb. 125 - State v. Turner

State v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently April 2008 · most notably State v. Williams (1986), State v. Dunster (2001)

2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

200198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Glasser v. United States · Brady v. United States · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Hamling v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A conflict of interest places a defense attorney in a situation inherently conducive to divided loyalties. The phrase “conflict of interest” denotes a situation in which regard for one duty tends to lead to disregard of another; where a lawyer’s representation of one client is rendered less effective by reason of his representation of another client; or where it becomes a lawyer’s duty on behalf of one client to contend for that which his duty to another client would require him to oppose.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “places a defense attorney in a situation inherently conducive to divided loyalties. . . . The phrase “conflict of interest” denotes a situation in which regard for one duty tends to lead to disregard of another . . . where a lawyer’s representation of one client is rendered less effective by reason of his representation of another client... or where it becomes a lawyer’s duty on behalf of one client to contend for that which his duty to another client would require him to oppose .... A conflict of interest exists “whenever one defendant stands to gain significantly by counsel adducing probative evidence or advancing plausible arguments that are damaging to the cause of a codefendant whom counsel is also representing.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A conflict of interest places a defense attorney in a situation inherently conducive to divided loyalties. . . . The phrase “conflict of interest” denotes a situation in which regard for one duty tends to lead to disregard of another... where a lawyer’s representation of one client is rendered less effective by reason of his representation of another client... or where it becomes a lawyer’s duty on behalf of one client to contend for that which his duty to another client would require him to oppose____A conflict of interest exists “whenever one defendant stands to gain significantly by counsel adducing probative evidence or advancing plausible arguments that are damaging to the cause of a codefendant whom counsel is also representing.”... In criminal proceedings a defendant’s right to effective counsel includes a lawyer’s representation free from conflicting interests____ However, a sole attorney’s multiple representation of codefendants is not per se a violation of the constitutional guarantee of effective assistance of counsel. . . . “An ‘attorney representing two defendants ... is in the best position professionally and ethically to determine when a conflict of interest exists or will probably develop in the course of atrial.’ ”... “In order to establish a violation of the Sixth Amendment, a defendant who raised no objection at trial must demonstrate that an actual conflict of interest adversely affected his lawyer’s performance____ “. . . Thus, a defendant who shows that ”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.