State v. Kaiser’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 1990
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Tweedy · State v. Ziemba · State v. Hiross · State v. Olson · State v. Hatfield
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The fallacy with this argument, however, is that appeals in criminal matters from the municipal court to the district court are not reviewed de novo upon the record; rather, they are reviewed “for error appearing on the record made in the county or municipal court.” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-541.06 (1) [Reissue 1985]----The district court in the instant case was functioning as an appellate court and not as a trial court; thus, it was restricted in its review to the record made in the lower court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.