State v. Juhl’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 1988
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1 · 18 U.S.C. § 5005 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act)
Relies on Tuten v. United States · United States v. Arrington · State v. Shepard · State v. Pope · State v. Holloman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.