218 N.J. Super. 133 - State v. Hass’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
May 2012
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. R.W. · People v. Morris · State in Interest of KAW · State ex rel. K.A.W.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the length of the alleged period of time in relation to the number of individual criminal acts alleged; the passage of time between the alleged period for the crime and defendant's arrest; the duration between the date of the indictment and the alleged offense; and the ability of the victim or complaining witness to particularize the date and time of the alleged transaction or offense. [ In re K.A.W., 104 N.J. 112, 122 , 515 A. 2d 1217 (1986) (citation omitted).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he central issue is whether, in light of the facts in the particular case (e.g. the age of the victim, the number of offenses and the time period involved), the defendant has received `fair notice' of the charges against him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.