State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 1983
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Martin · State v. Clay · State v. Buchanan · State v. Hephner · State v. Tokatlian
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * [T]he fact testimony used in rebuttal might have been used as part of the State’s main case does not render it inadmissible in rebuttal if it rebuts some of the matters testified to by defendant’s witnesses. * * * [citing authority]. * * “As the State points out, we have also held several times the trial court has discretion to admit in rebuttal evidence which should have been offered in chief that is not strictly rebuttal. * * * [citing authori-j # * * U * * * “We recognize the general rule that the trial court has a good deal of discretion in determining what is proper rebuttal testimony. * * * [citing authorities]. * * “Rebutting evidence is that which explains, repels, controverts, or disproves evidence produced by the other side. * * * [citing authorities]. U * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Proulx
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.