Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 218 N.Y. 573 - Fulton Trust Co. v. . Phillips

Fulton Trust Co. v. . Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

107
cited by 107 later decisions
5
states following
February 1970
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 100 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 107 later decisions — most recently February 1970 · most notably Spiegel's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1949), In Re the Accounting of Buechner (1919)

2 federal appellate · 100 state decisions

2701916192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedFulton Trust Co. v. Phillips

Relationships

Relies on Vanderpoel v. . Loew · 8 E.H. Smith 496 - Hersee v. . Simpson · Cammann v. . Bailey · Matter of Tienken · Steinway v. . Steinway

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * if the gift is absolute and the time for payment only is postponed the gift is not suspended, but the title vests at once. While a great many authorities might be cited in support of this proposition it is sufficient to refer to Matter of Embree ( 9 App. Div. 602 ; affd., 154 N. Y. 778 ); Dickerson v. Sheehy ( 156 App. Div. 101 ; affd., 209 N. Y. 592 ) and Cammann v. Bailey ( 210 N. Y. 19, 30 ), where the leading authorities on this subject are reviewed. “ In the case now under consideration we think that the intention of the testatrix is clear that .the gift of the residuary estate is absolute and only the time of payment or enjoyment is postponed.” (See, also, Matter of Carroll, 274 N. Y. 288 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.