Booth v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2026
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Allen v. McCurry · Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc. · United States v. Brown · Fanning v. Brown · United States v. Visinaiz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“based upon certain factors, including: a. The nature and amount of restitution shall be sufficient to restore the crime victim to the equivalent economic status existing prior to the losses sustained as a direct result of the crime, and may allow the crime victim to receive payment in excess of the losses sustained; provided, the excess amount of restitution shall not be more than treble the actual economic loss incurred. This statute recognizes that the restoration of a victim to his or her”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“of the restitution amount. This was alleged to cause accrual of interest on monies already paid to Mrs. Swartz, contrary to the parties' agreement and”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“concede that the failure to properly appeal the original order prevents them from re-urging the legal flaws in that order,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.