Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 218 P.3d 709 - Currier v. Sutherland

Currier v. Sutherland’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

1 district · 20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore. · Austin Nursing Center, Inc. v. Lovato · Thompson v. Peck · Vorhees v. Baltazar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because a lack of subject matter jurisdiction means that a court has no power to hear a case or enter a judgment, it is an issue that may be raised at any time, even after a verdict has been entered.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Once a plaintiff files an amended complaint, the original complaint is superseded, and the defendant must answer the amended complaint.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “‘unrestricted and sweeping jurisdictional powers’ are only limited by ... ‘ statute or constitutional provision.’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.