Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 218 PASUPER 239 - Commonwealth v. Hurst

Commonwealth v. Hurst’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 1972
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · United Biscuit Co. of America v. Federal Trade Commission · Commonwealth v. Baker · New York Central R. Co. v. United States · Commonwealth v. Sparks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““History of the Case : Appellant was convicted of charges of armed robbery by the Honorable Vincent A. Carroll after a plea of guilty and received a sentence of 20 to 40 years. Appellant filed a post-conviction petition which was denied by the Honorable Maurice Sporkin in July, 1967. Appellant thereafter filed a second petition and from the denial thereof has taken the instant appeal. “Argument : Present counsel has researched the proceedings above referred to and is of the opinion that there is no merit to the contentions advanced by appellant. She has so informed him as evidenced by a letter, a copy of which is annexed hereto and made part hereof.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.