218 So. 2d 5 - Seaney v. Seaney’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2006
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Herrin, Lambert & Co. v. Daly · Davis v. Davis · Alexander v. Hancock · J. W. Sanders Cotton Mill, Inc. v. Moody
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“at which there will be an evidentiary hearing upon the merits of the key issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“until entry of the decree following an evidentiary hearing upon the merits * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“heard all of the evidence and * * * (was) fully advised.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.