¶11 denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
¶2Moreover, relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Wright v. State, 15-2328 (La. 3/24/16), 188 So.3d 1019.