Randall v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Now, when a canse of action which would be cognizable in the justice court is combined with other causes of action, and suit thereon is -brought in the district or county court, the ease is to be tried according to the practice in the court in which the suit is brought. As we have already seen, ‘Venue’ is made one of the subdivisional chapters of the general title of ‘Practice’ in such courts. So we conclude that the venue of this suit is'to be determined by the provisions of the statute providing for venue of suits in the district and county courts. The following cases involve decisions on somewhat analogous questions: Cockrill v. Cox, 65 Tex. 675 ; Hedrick v. McLaughlin [Tex. Civ. App.] 214 S. W. 985 , par. 2, and authorities cited.” See, also, Sparks v. West, 41 S.W.(2d) 301 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Lewis v. Skelton