¶1 ORDER
¶2 Rainey Gregory (“Defendant”) appeals from his conviction on one count of manu- *556 factoring methamphetamine, two counts of resisting arrest and one count of assaulting a law enforcement officer.
¶3 Defendant claims only one point on appeal. He alleges that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence seized in his apartment because the police officer did not have a search warrant.
¶4 No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.
¶5 We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).