Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 218 U.S. 302 - Ling Su Fan v. United States

Ling Su Fan v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

218 U.S. 302 · 1910

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
13
cited 13 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 5 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2015 · most notably Norman v. Baltimore & or (1935), Perry v. United States (1935)

12 federal appellate · 5 district · 10 state decisions

22019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chicago Co v. City of Chicago · Lawton v. Steele · Buttfield v. Stranahan · The American Insurance Company v. 356 Bales of Cotton David Canter · Frisbie v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as a legal tender and as a medium of exchange,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]o coin Money, [and] regulate the Value thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.