Lucino Almeida Chantangco v. Eduardo Abaroa’s Empirical Analysis
218 U.S. 476 · 1910
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 7 district · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 90 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2016 · most notably Helvering v. Mitchell (1938), United States v. One Assortment of 89 Firearms (1984)
25 federal appellate · 7 district · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cromwell v. County of Sac · Russell v. Place · Coffey v. United States · Southern Pac Co v. United States · New Orleans v. Citizens' Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The general rule of the common law is that a judgment in a criminal proceeding cannot be read in evidence in a civil action to establish, any fact there determined. ’ ’”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The foregoing considerations eliminate any question of the effect of such a judgment of acquittal under the principles of the common law.” (p. 486.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Roach
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.