Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 218 Va. 134 - Hurdle v. Prinz

Hurdle v. Prinz’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
January 2005
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 2005

12 state decisions

601977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ferguson v. Ferguson · Walke v. Dallas, Inc. · 68 Wis. 2d 760 - Feest v. Allis-Chalmers Corp. · Arnold v. Davis · United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Blue Diamond Coal Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No new law shall be construed to repeal a former law, as to any offense committed against the former law, or as to any act done, any penalty, forfeiture, or punishment incurred, or any right accrued, or claim arising under the former law, or in any way whatever to affect any such offense or act so committed or done, or any penalty, forfeiture, or punishment so incurred, or any right accrued, or claim arising before the new law takes effect; save only that the proceedings thereafter had shall conform, so far as practicable, to the laws in force at the time of such proceedings. ... (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Her suit was filed on September 10, 1974, more than two years after she reached the age of 18 on July 13, 1972.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.