Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 218 Va. 560 - Willis v. Commonwealth

Willis v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
July 2005
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2005

22 state decisions

1001977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vance v. Commonwealth · Legions v. Commonwealth · Young v. Commonwealth · Broaddus v. Commonwealth · Addington v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “You may find the defendant guilty on the testimony of (name of person) alone if it is credible and you believe it beyond a reasonable doubt. But if her testimony is incredible, or so contrary to human experience or to usual human behavior as to make it unworthy of belief, it is not sufficient to support a finding of guilty. If considering whether or not her testimony is credible, you may consider an unreasonable delay, if any, in reporting the alleged offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The failure to report an alleged rape by force and violence for an unreasonable period after the incident occurred casts suspicion and doubt on the truthfulness of the story of a prosecutrix unless there is a credible explanation given for such a delay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.