Paulsen v. Gundersen’s Empirical Analysis
1935
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2025
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Whitney v. Karner · First National Bank of Wausau v. Kromer · Gross Coal Co. v. City of Milwaukee · Galst v. American Ladder Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The claim that the court’s first order denying a new trial is res ad judicata as to any subsequent order on the same motion cannot be sustained.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“guilty of an assault and would be responsible for damages resulting therefrom”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.