Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 218 Wis. 2d 290 - State v. Konrath

218 Wis. 2d 290 - State v. Konrath’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
3
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Ferdon Ex Rel. Petrucelli v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund (2005), 221 Wis. 2d 630 - Juneau County v. Courthouse Employees (1998)

25 state decisions

1601998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fuentes v. Shevin · United States v. Salerno · New York v. Ferber · Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co. · Dowling v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'If a court holds a statute unconstitutional on its face, the state may not enforce it under any circumstances, unless an appropriate court narrows its application; in contrast, when a court holds a statute unconstitutional as applied to particular facts, the state may enforce the statute in different circumstances.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “With the exception of a challenge under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, a party does not have standing to raise a facial challenge that a statute is overbroad.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he United States Supreme Court has not consistently applied the 'no set of circumstances' language.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.