State v. Klokic’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew Payne (2013), State v. PAREDES-SOLANO (2009)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. · 51 Cal. 3d 72 - People v. Stankewitz · State v. Anderson · State v. Guerra · State v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[M]ultiple acts may be considered part of the same criminal transaction when the defendant offers essentially the same defense to each of the acts and there is no reasonable basis for the jury to distinguish between them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“presents the same problems as a duplicitous indictment,” including”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.