Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 Ark. 586 - Revis v. Harris

Revis v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
April 2005
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2005

22 state decisions

70195119601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Dandridge · Vick Consolidated School District No. 21 v. New · Sitton v. Burnett · Gantt v. Arkansas Power & Light Co. · Logan v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the absence of the prohibitory words “null and void” and where the contract has been performed by the parties in good faith, compensation may be retained measured by the reasonable value thereof. Such recovery, however, is not because of the contract, but is grounded squarely upon the proposition that valuable services having been rendered which have been accepted by the parties, it would be inequitable and unjust to permit one party to substantially gain under the contract to the great and irreparable damage of the other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.