Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 ARK 762 - Garner v. Horne

Garner v. Horne’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 1973
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Eppstein v. Kuhn · Moore v. Gariglietti · Sebold v. Williamson · Osborne v. Fairley · Bonner v. Little

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As to Mrs. Odum’s one-fourth interest, little need be said. She did not agree to sell her interest to the Garners and did not sign any papers to them, and she disavowed any power of W. D. Horne to act for her. In the record in this case we cannot find facts sufficient to support any application of ‘agency by estoppel’, as urged by appellants ; so we affirm as to Mrs. Odum’s interest.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.