In Re Stroud’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2016
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1328 · 11 U.S.C. § 349 · 11 U.S.C. § 522
Relies on McRoberts v. Transouth Financial (In Re Bell) · Public Finance Corp. v. Lantz (In Re Lantz) · Sands v. Blazer Financial Services Inc. (In Re Sands) · Gibbons v. Opechee Distributors, Inc. (In Re Gibbons) · Matter of Simmons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While 11 U.S.C. § 349 (b)(1)(B) does mandate that a judicial lien be reinstated upon the failure of Debtors to complete their plan, GMAC could withstand irreversible harm in that it could be difficult to reattach the lien or GMAC could be left with no security in which to satisfy their claim upon a failure of the Debtors to complete their Chapter 13 Plan.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Prince
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.