Luse v. Peters’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently January 1985 · most notably Cox v. Summa Corp. (1985), 76 Cal. App. 2d 75 - Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance Society (1946)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on California Trust Co. v. Cohn · Terry Trading Corp. v. Barsky · Shain v. Belvin · Cornblith v. Valentine · Coulthurst v. Coulthurst
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'... must tend to diminish or defeat the plaintiff's recovery and must exist in favor of a defendant and against a plaintiff between whom a several judgment might be had in the action.' (Terry Trading Corp. v. Barsky, 210 Cal. 428 [ 292 P. 474 ], Luse v. Peters, ante, p. 625 [ 28 P.2d 357 ].)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A cross-complaint is a pleading separate and apart from the answer, and is required to be complete and sufficient in itself. It cannot be aided by averments to the answer”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.