Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 CALAPP3D 218 - Sesler v. Ghumman

Sesler v. Ghumman’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2011

10 state decisions

60199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 21 Cal. 3d 869 - Lemons v. Regents of University of California · Self v. General Motors Corp. · 230 Cal. App. 2d 987 - Alvarez v. Felker Manufacturing Co. · Borenkraut v. Whitten · 53 Cal. 2d 826 - Hildebrand v. Los Angeles Junction Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court should not require a party to rely on abstract generalities in presenting its legal theory of the case to the jury, but should instruct the jury on vital issues in terms that relate to the particular case before it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.