Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 CALAPP4TH 278 - Dromy v. Lukovsky

Dromy v. Lukovsky’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 40 Cal. 3d 488 - Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc. · 171 Cal. App. 4th 1004 - Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood Apartments · Kulawitz v. Pacific Woodenware & Paper Co. · 125 Cal. App. 4th 578 - Andrews v. Mobile Aire Estates · 274 Cal. App. 2d 1 - People v. Plane

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Landlords have a strong interest in being able to sell their property if they choose to do so. The law generally favors free alienability of property. A landlord’s ability to sell his or her property may be negatively impacted if the landlord cannot exhibit the property to prospective buyers at reasonable times.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.