State v. Joly’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2 district · 134 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 136 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably State v. Robinson (1993), State v. Indrisano (1994)
2 district · 134 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chambers v. Mississippi · Doyle v. Ohio · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Hamling v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 136 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not logical relevance alone, however, that secures the admission of evidence. Logically relevant evidence must also be legally relevant ... that is, not subject to exclusion for any one of the following prejudicial effects: (1) where the facts offered may unduly arouse the jury’s emotions, hostility or sympathy, (2) where the proof and answering evidence it provokes may create a side issue that will unduly distract the jury from the main issues, (3) where the evidence offered and the counter-proof will consume an undue amount of time, and (4) where the defendant, having no reasonable ground to anticipate the evidence, is unfairly surprised and unprepared to meet it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“guilty consciousness is perhaps the strongest evidence ... that the person is indeed the guilty doer....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Otto“unquestionably had the tendency adversely to affect the jury's attitude toward the defendant ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.