Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 CONN 262 - Lago v. Guerrette

Lago v. Guerrette’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 2010 · most notably Castonguay v. Plourde (1997), Lakeview Associates v. Woodlake Master Condominium Ass'n (1997)

28 state decisions

190199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. Bulaong · Kelly v. Ivler · American Brass Co. v. Serra · Gager v. Carlson · MacKin v. MacKin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For a determination of the character and extent of an easement created by deed we must look to the language of the deed, the situation of the property and the surrounding circumstances in order to ascertain the intention of the parties. . . . The language of the grant will be given its ordinary import in the absence of anything in the situation or surrounding circumstances which indicates a contrary intent. . . . The meaning and effect of the reservation are to be determined, not by the actual intent of the CT Page 10899 parties, but by the intent expressed in the deed, considering all its relevant provisions and reading it in the light of the surrounding circumstances. . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he meaning and effect of the reservation are to be determined, not by the actual intent of the parties, but by the intent expressed in the deed, considering all its relevant provisions and reading it in the light of the surrounding circumstances . . . and its interpretation present[s] a question of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “it certainly was inferable that there was some linkage in [the grantor's] mind”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.