Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 CONN 295 - State v. Diggs

State v. Diggs’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
1
states following
September 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably State v. Chapman (1994), State v. Whitford (2002)

2 federal appellate · 58 state decisions

2601991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Marathon Oil Co. v. United States · Thompson v. Thompson · Logiudice v. Georgia · Los Angeles Unified School District v. Los Angeles NAACP · Batick v. Seymour

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]n instruction as to the effect of an aggressor withdrawing from an encounter and communicating the intent to withdraw is only necessary where the particular factual situation supports such an instruction.... Further, the doctrine of communicated withdrawal may not be invoked unless the aggressor's intent to withdraw is clearly made known to his victim.... In other words, the initial aggressor must withdraw or abandon the conflict in such a way that the fact of withdrawal is perceived by his opponent, so that his adversary is aware that he is no longer in any danger from the original aggressor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “record contains no evidence that reasonably would support a finding that the defendant had withdrawn from the encounter with the victim or had clearly manifested his intention to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.