Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 CONN 529 - State v. Barton

State v. Barton’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

307
cited by 307 later decisions
2
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 12 district · 290 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 307 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably State v. Geisler (1992), State v. Sivri (1994)

3 federal appellate · 12 district · 290 state decisions

19101991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Franks v. Delaware · Aguilar v. Texas · Brinegar v. United States · Spinelli v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 307 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Probable cause, broadly defined, comprises such facts as would reasonably persuade an impartial and reasonable mind not merely to suspect or conjecture, but to believe that criminal activity has occurred.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Probable cause to search exists if: 1) there is probable cause to believe that the particular items sought to be seized are connected with criminal activity; and 2) there is probable cause to believe that the items named will be found in the place to be searched.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “must determine that the affidavit presented a substantial factual basis upon which the [issuing judge] could conclude that probable cause existed.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.