Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 CONN 557 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

103
cited by 103 later decisions
2
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

103 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably State v. Sivri (1994), State v. Cobb (1999)

103 state decisions

8501991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · United States v. Ventresca · Andresen v. Maryland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the validity of [the] warrant ... [if] the affidavit at issue presented a substantial factual basis for the magistrate’s conclusion that probable cause existed.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Duntz, 223 Conn. 207, 215 , 613 A.2d 224 (1992).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In determining the existence of probable cause to search, the issuing judge must make a practical, nontechnical decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the warrant affidavit . . . there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “searched him only after he left the multiple unit building, not immediately after he left the defendants' apartment,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.