State v. Payne’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
111 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 111 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Fink v. Golenbock (1996), State v. Pinnock (1992)
111 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Manson v. Brathwaite · Chambers v. Mississippi · State v. Golding · Nicholas v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A defendant who moves to suppress identification evidence bears the initial burden of proving that the identification resulted from an unconstitutional procedure. State v. Hinton , 196 Conn. 289 , 293 , 493 A.2d 836 (1985).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“we have recognized that an arraignment identification may be 'suggestive' "); see also State v. Ledbetter , 185 Conn. 607 , 613, 441 A.2d 595 (1981) ("[t]he mischief involved in the arraignment observation is the real possibility that the victim of one crime, armed with the * knowledge that the suspect is being charged with another crime, possibly of the same character, is more likely to leap to the conclusion that the person being arraigned in front of him committed both crimes”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harris“we recognize the potential for suggestiveness inherent in an arraignment identification”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.