Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 CTCL 697 - Schnakenberg

Schnakenberg’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
October 2000
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2000

1 federal appellate ·

501979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Koppers Co. v. United States · Wathen v. United States · Charles H. Young v. Robert E. Hampton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “substantial evidence can support either of two contrary findings, but only one finding can have a preponderance”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.