Mackay v. Uinta Development Co.’s Empirical Analysis
219 F. 116 · 1914
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2025
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Camfield v. United States · Buford v. Houtz · Interstate Consolidated Street Railway Company v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Lazarus v. Phelps · Stoddard v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(N)o person, by force, threats, intimidation . . . or any other unlawful means, shall prevent or obstruct . . . free passage over or through the public lands. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the obstruction of free passage or transit over the public lands of persons only.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.