Mackay v. Uinta Development Co.

Decided November 10, 1914.)

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1914-11-10

Tn Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Wyoming. Actions at law by the Uinta Development Company against <|)aniel Madiay and against the Stewart-Harding Sheep Company. Judgments for plaintiff and defendants bring error.

2 counsel of record

Relies on Mackay v. Uinta Development Co.

Beversed · Opinion by William Cather Hook · Decided 1914-11-10

¶1Tn Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Wyoming.

¶2Actions at law by the Uinta Development Company against <|)aniel Madiay and against the Stewart-Harding Sheep Company. Judgments for plaintiff and defendants bring error.

¶3Beversed.

¶4 *122Barnard J. Stewart, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for plaintiffs in error.

¶5John W. Lacey, Of Cheyenne, Wyo. (T. S. Taliaferro, of Bock Springs, Wyo., and'Herbert Y. Lacey, of Cheyenne, Wyo., on the brief), for defendant in error. Before SANBORN and HOOK, Circuit Judges, and POPE, District Judge.

¶6HOOK, Circuit Judge.

¶7The controlling features of these cases are like those of John C. Mackay v. Uinta Development Co., 219 Fed. 116, 135 C. C. A. 18, just decided. The same conclusion accordingly follows.

¶8SANBORN, Circuit Judge, dissents.