Dana v. Morgan’s Empirical Analysis
219 F. 313 · 1914
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 1964
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wabash Railroad Company v. Adelbert College of the Western Reserve University · Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co. · Veeder v. . Baker · United States Steel Corp. v. Hodge · Willoughby v. Chicago Junction Railways & Union Stock Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is that even stockholders cannot ratify a fraud.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Eshleman v. Keenan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.