Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 F.1d 68 - Emerine v. Tarault

Emerine v. Tarault’s Empirical Analysis

219 F. 68 · 1915

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
February 1943
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 1943

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

201915192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Courtney v. Fidelity Trust Co. · In re Hornstein · Leighton v. Kennedy · In re Ashland Steel Co. · Stroheim v. Lewis F. Perry & Whitney Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Accordingly secured creditors may be counted as petitioning creditors to the extent of their provable claims in excess of the value of the securities held, but only to such extent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.