Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 F.1d 694 - Sullivan v. Ellis

Sullivan v. Ellis’s Empirical Analysis

219 F. 694 · 1915

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 1996
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1996

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

40191519201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Boyd · Sullivan v. Portland and Kennebec Railroad Company · Kelley v. Boettcher · Thomas v. Pacific Beach Co. · Bills v. Silver King Mining Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ - * * Although the maker of a demand note is not in default until he refuses payment until after demand therefor, it is generally held that a note payable on demand is due immediately, so that suit may be maintained on it at any time after delivery without any other demand than the suit. This rule may not apply, however, when there is something on the paper, or in the circumstances under which it was given, to show that it was not the intention that it should become due immediately, * * * ” [Emphasis supplied.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The general rule with regard to commercial paper, payable on demand, is that it becomes due immediately, and that the statute of limitations begins to run from its date. “ ‘This rule may not apply where there is something on the paper, or in the circumstances under which it is given, showing that it was not the intention that it should become due immediately.’ 7 Cyc. 848, 849.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.