Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

219 F.2d 114

Docket Misc. No. 409.

Frank Buzzie v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom Prison

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1955-01-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1955

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Taylor v. Squier

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1955-01-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Frank Buzzie in pro. per.

No appearance for respondent.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and BONE and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Buzzie's motion to have an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed forma pauperis was denied by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Northern Division, and no appeal was taken.

¶2

He now has applied to this court for a writ of habeas corpus. We are without jurisdiction to grant the writ and the application is dismissed. Taylor v. Squier, 9 Cir., 183 F.2d 67; 28 U.S.C. 2241.

/219/f2d/114 · .json · Public domain