Mason v. Cranor

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Feb. 7, 1955.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1955-02-07

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1955-02-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 1990

3 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Ben F. Mason, in pro. per.

¶2Don Eastvold, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

¶3 *236Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Movant alleges that he has appealed from an order denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Southern Division.

¶6He seeks bail pending appeal. Rule 27, subd. 1 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit provides:

¶7“Pending an appeal from the final decision of any court or judge declining to grant the writ of habeas corpus, the custody of the prisoner shall not be disturbed.” See also Rule 49, Rules of the Supreme Court, 28 U.S.C.A.

¶8The motion is denied.