Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 F.2d 404 - Hyun v. Landon

Hyun v. Landon’s Empirical Analysis

219 F.2d 404 · 1955

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently November 2010 · most notably Hirsch v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1962), Navarrette-Navarrette v. Landon (1955)

21 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

1601955196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Edwin Hale v. William Henkel · Harisiades v. Shaughnessy · Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. Mezei · United States v. Bryan · Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * repeatedly held that financial inability of an alien to insure attendance of himself or his attorney, or both, at a place where depositions are being taken is not a denial of due process. * * *"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is well settled that the power of Congress to regulate the deportation of aliens is plenary and only in the case of extreme abuse will the courts interfere.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “* * * he was financially unable to transport his counsel to Honolulu or procure Honolulu counsel to represent him at the depositions. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.