Shew v. Dulles’s Empirical Analysis
219 F.2d 413 · 1954
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2106 · 28 U.S.C. § 46 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1503 (§ 360 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 501
Relies on Kwock Jan Fat v. White · Western Pac Corp v. Western Pac R Co Metzger · Howell Chevrolet Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Howell Chevrolet Co. · Fulkerson v. Holmes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no special quantum of proof should be exacted from any person claiming American citizenship merely because of his racial origin. In Kwock Jan Fat v. White, 253 U.S. 454 , 464, 40 S.Ct. 566, 570, 64 L.Ed. 1010, the Supreme Court, reversing this court, said: `It is better that many Chinese immigrants should be improperly admitted than that one natural born citizen of the United States should be permanently excluded from his country.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ng Yip Yee v. Barber“with directions to make findings as to whether Wong Hie is the father of Wong Gong Fay, such findings to be made in the light of the decisions of this court, supra, and thereupon enter such judgment as may be proper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.