Direct Transit Lines, Inc. v. Starr’s Empirical Analysis
219 F.2d 699 · 1955
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 1973
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 29 U.S.C. § 151 (§ 1 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass'n · Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776 · United Const Workers Affiliated with United Mine Workers of America v. Laburnum Const Corp · Ritter v. United States · Ex parte Harding
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It would appear that the proper remedy, if the cause is within the exclusive purview of the National Labor Relations Board, is not removal to the United States district court, but by appropriate action in the state court, as in Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs and Helpers Local Union, 1953, 346 U.S. 485 , 74 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed. 228 . This view is in accord with two other district courts in this Circuit which have considered the question, as well as with district courts elsewhere.” [citing cases].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““. . .we are of the opinion that the action is not one of which the federal district courts have original jurisdiction, that the district court therefore had no jurisdiction upon removal, and that the cause should accordingly have been remanded to the Superior Court . . .” See also: California Packing Corp. v. I.L.W.U. Local 142, 253 F.Supp. 597, 599 (D.Hawaii, 1966); California Ass’n v. Building and Const. Tr. Council, 178 F.2d 175, 177 (9th Cir. 1949).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.