Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 F.3d 1115 - Cedic Development Co. v. Warnicke

Cedic Development Co. v. Warnicke’s Empirical Analysis

219 F.3d 1115 · 2000

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
March 2007
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on City of Burlington v. Dague · Ed. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a Corporation, Richard A. Perkins, Counsel for Ed Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a Corporation, H. O'Neil Shanks, and Norman Stevans, Richard A. Perkins, Counsel For · Burgess v. Klenske · Kord Enterprises II v. California Commerce Bank

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.