Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 F.3d 1216 - Arlen Rose v. The Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Company -

Arlen Rose v. The Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Company -’s Empirical Analysis

219 F.3d 1216 · 2000

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Simms v. Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services · Wolfgang v. Mid-America Motorsports, Inc. · Den Hartog v. Wasatch Academy · Blanke v. Alexander · Ambus v. Granite Board of Education

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to affirmatively prevent an employer from presenting the very evidence used as a basis for its termination decision.” Id. at 1220 . Even though the court in Rose allowed the nolo plea to be admitted, it nonetheless noted that,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.