Nippon Steel Corporation Nkk Corporation Kawasaki Steel Corporation Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd v. United States Uss-Posco Industries’s Empirical Analysis
219 F.3d 1348 · 2000
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · McKart v. United States · Far East Conference v. United States · Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co. · Armour & Co. v. Wantock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the jurisdictional issue and the merits [were] inextricably intertwined,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“omitted). We also observed that the explicit exclusions in Wheatland “were well known when the order was issued” and amounted to more than “insignificant alterations to an existing product.” Id. at 1356 . Unlike Wheatland, the duty order at issue contains no explicit exclusion of small-diameter steel wire rod. Although the scope of the duty order sets a cross-sectional range (5.00 mm to 19.00”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“ordinarily should not interfere with an agency until it has completed its action, or else has clearly exceeded its jurisdiction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.